i can

Dawn May

Dawn May

Bookmark and Share

October 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« 2012 - Looking Forward | Main | Ethernet Link Aggregation in IBM i »

January 17, 2012


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Planning for Solid State Drives:


Big thing, even when doing the on site, is to make sure you're doing an apples-to-apples comparison. We did such a test of SSD's in an IASP. However due to some difficulties with setting up the journalling we just turned journalling off. That really skewed the results in favor of the SSD's. Money would have better spent on purchasing 5770SS1-42-HA journal performance. That made significantly more of a difference on our machine than SSD's did.

Would also be nice if
"PTF Requirements for Solid State Drives (SSD)"

was updated and this information available at
"Recommended fixes"

Your point about "apples-to-apples comparison" is correct; what might seem like minor changes in an environment can indeed skew the results. This is true for any type of performance comparison.

Regarding the second comment about PTFs - I will see what I can do regarding information about the PTFs. If any changes are made, I'll post an update here.


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.